Quote:
Originally Posted by Koxinga
I suppose one could be a wiseass and just post a reply consisting of "............" to meet that ridiculous requirement.
IMNSHO, it's downright moronic.
With that kind of coerced participation, you end up with quantity but with a complete disregard for quality of the individual postings.
My bro has a message board with over 15K members - and will probably top 20K before long- and if he had this kind of asinine rule in place his forum would be in shambles.
Better for members to stay silent when they have nothing intelligent to add rather than posting just for the sake of taking up bandwidth, I say.
Thanks  |
You are right, the quantity over quality thing concerns me too.
I just hope that you two guys don't get majorly angry about each other here.
Maybe we can discuss this with somehow politer words?
The discussion could get interesting, we just gotta respect that AZNLover as a site owner in the end can do whatever he wants here.
Not every change will meet every individuals tastes.
But ok, you have not been wasting bandwidth so far and I know you aren't the type to do so either, I understand that a message to tell you to post when you feel you don't want to rubs you the wrong way.
Not everyone is as talkative as me after all.
