Is BNP party agenda a reflection of frustration of brits?
Notices
Welcome to AZNLover.com - AMXF Social Networking Community. A site dedicated to celebrating "AM/XF" relationships, romances, appreciation for Asian culture between Asian men and women of any background. Online since 2004, we provide a community between people with similar issues, questions and curiosities, and to foster interaction between females of all races and Asian males.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact Contact us. Didn't get the Registration Confirmation - Resend Activation Email
AznLover United KingdomDiscussions about living, working, studying, visiting, or playing in the United Kingdom.
I believe that Brits are tired of bowing over muslims demands for many things. People are afraid of refusing to Muslims demands for Halal foods, mosques etc... The BNP party wants to put a stop to the Islamic culture expansion across the UK. The party wants schools to serve public instead of catering to religious groups of any kind including Muslims, Jewish groups. Parent groups are tired of seeing the school menu change to fit Muslims.
This trend also occur in Canada which Muslim demand school serve meals friendly to Islam. I think this is rediculous that one religious group can exert power over a secular education system. Muslims want to convert secular institutions into Islamic version hence it cause a backlash against them. Austria told Muslims that enough is enough. Austrian society isn't going to bend over backward to accommodate Muslims. Muslims have the responsibility to adapt to European culture. For instance, if Muslims want to eat Halal meal at school, they have to bring their lunches. The university isn't required to provide Muslims with prayer room. Education institution is a secular organization of Brit culture. It isn't subjected to Church law or any religious faith.
Officials from the English National Ballet faced calls to sack one of their leading dancers yesterday after Simone Clarke defied criticism and gave a detailed interview defending her support for the British National party.
Two weeks after she was named by the Guardian as a card-carrying member of the far right group, the ballerina hit out at her critics, voicing her belief that the BNP seemed to be the only party "willing to take a stand" against immigration. She claimed that her boyfriend Yat Sen-Chang, who is also an acclaimed lead dancer, encouraged her to join the BNP. Sen-Chang is of Chinese-Cuban extraction.
Clarke, 36, who will take the lead in the ENB's production of Giselle at the London Coliseum next week, said she had been called a "racist and a fascist" since her decision to join the BNP 18 months ago became public.
One report claimed that following the Guardian's revelations, fellow dancers confronted her before a matinee performance of The Nutcracker.
But she said: "I've never been clearer in my head that I'm moving in the right direction and at the right time. I've had nearly 300 emails supporting me from all over the UK and from as far away as Australia, America and New Zealand."
She told the Mail on Sunday: "Everything will be different now. I will be known as the BNP Ballerina. I think that will stick with me for life."
But she added: "I don't regret anything. I will stay a member."
Because of the historical legacy of Colonialism, the nations of the West have a moral obligation to take in non-White immigrants because:
a.) They invited them in in the first place -- to work in factories and take out the trash so that white fowks wouldn't have to do it and so white kids could go to college and join the management class instead.
b.) They fucked up and exploited (and continue to exploit) African, Latin American, Middle Eastern and Asian countries. See, eg, the Opium Wars.
c.) The redneck shitkickers who complain will just have to suck it up and get down with that shit because that's what redneck shitkickers were born to do anways.
Because of the historical legacy of Colonialism, the nations of the West have a moral obligation to take in non-White immigrants because:
a.) They invited them in in the first place -- to work in factories and take out the trash so that white fowks wouldn't have to do it and so white kids could go to college and join the management class instead.
b.) They fucked up and exploited (and continue to exploit) African, Latin American, Middle Eastern and Asian countries. See, eg, the Opium Wars.
c.) The redneck shitkickers who complain will just have to suck it up and get down with that shit because that's what redneck shitkickers were born to do anways.
... any questions?
sweden has the highest proportion of 3rd world immigrants it accepts into its country, higher than even the us, which has unleashed a flood of arab, pakistani, and other muslim immigrants into their country, causing their crime and rape statistics to go up dramatically. sweden never had any colonies einstein. neither did norway, denmark, or any other country in scandinavia and they donate more money per capita to third-world developing nations than any of the countries in asia. get your facts straight.
japan took in koreans as workers who are even now treated a second-class citizens in japan despite being 2nd to 3rd generation 'japanese' residents. japan would probably go to war rather than let tokyo for example become 40% philippino.
japan attacked and exploited countries throughout asia but have strict controls on non-1st world foreigners allowed to enter and live in their country.
neither did norway, denmark, or any other country in scandinavia
sorry but you dont have the facts....
while the scandanavian countries were far less aggressive in collecting colonies then some of the well known ones... they in fact had colonies just the same....
Norway is the only one you listed that didnt have any colonial possessions, although for the period where europeans were collecting colonial possessions Norway was under the rule of Denmark.
but you're right that Japan if colonial exploitation was the measure, then they probably have more responsibility to 3rd world nations then most of the scandanavian countries, but they arent blameless either. nor is their immigration policy based on their colonial guilty conscience. most of those countries are facing declining population and they need people/workers to fund their social programs..
Nordic-kulta, Pidän sinusta oikein paljon. Kiinalaisten ja suomalaisten lapsista tulee kauniita!
Last edited by ratbert1009ca; 01-17-2007 at 12:15 AM.
sorry but you dont have the facts....
while the scandanavian countries were far less aggressive in collecting colonies then some of the well known ones... they in fact had colonies just the same....
Norway is the only one you listed that didnt have any colonial possessions, although for the period where europeans were collecting colonial possessions Norway was under the rule of Denmark.
but you're right that Japan if colonial exploitation was the measure, then they probably have more responsibility to 3rd world nations then most of the scandanavian countries, but they arent blameless either. nor is their immigration policy based on their colonial guilty conscience. most of those countries are facing declining population and they need people/workers to fund their social programs..
one comment before i put your stupidity on ignore. practically every nation has gone abroad and conquered, even african nations, so lets stick with significant colonies in this century shall we?
one comment before i put your stupidity on ignore. practically every nation has gone abroad and conquered, even african nations, so lets stick with significant colonies in this century shall we?
so you were proven wrong so now you just slink away with some straw man argument... bravo
btw: using words like idiot to insult people? really adult...ya thumbs up dood. at least come up with better insults
Last edited by ratbert1009ca; 01-17-2007 at 12:58 AM.